Viewing 200+ TV channels by number & a 4-character station ID is not usable

For starters, I love DIRECTV.

However, I’m wondering when they (and other satellite & cable providers) will begin to think differently about how they present channel guides both online and via the TV remote?

Here’s DIRECTV’s guide:

These are mainly local channels. Wouldn’t it be better to offer a filter that said “Local Channels” that I could click and see these? I’m not familiar enough with the Station IDs to know if they represent ABC, NBC, CBS, etc. Sure, I can generally tell by the programming listed, but still. This would never fly on a major retailer website for listing products this way.

If TV stations were like consumer products…

If this were an e-commerce site, end-users would be driven away if they were forced to only view products by numerical product ID and a short-code. Through history of channel surfing by number, I suppose this method of thinking is engrained in many people’s minds.

However, with the volume of channels being what they are, presenting them in numerical channel order is a growing usability challenge. I live in a world where I DVR virtually everything and watch it at a later date. I am completely channel number and station ID agnostic — I honestly don’t know what channels “my shows” are on.

Searching for TV shows

Let’s look at keyword search results for “olympics”

Support topics are shown first. Then site pages.  Hopefully there’s research to support this ordering, but generally speaking, a topic like “olympics” is probably more related to TV programming than a support article. “Satellite doesn’t work” would certainly be a reason to show support articles first. Below the fold (scrolling down on a 20″ monitor) I see 5 results for TV programming.

I don’t know what NBCw vs. NBCwHD means. Unfortunately there’s no title for me to click on to find out why this matched my search for “olympics.” Let’s click “view all”:

More empty titles. Again, search results displayed by channel and then by date with no sorting options.

DIRECTV offers a slick option to “Record to DVR” from their website. As such, having the ability to filter search results by content rather than channel and date/time is important because on the web and with the ability to “Record to DVR”, the channel and date/time are irrelevant.

Post to Twitter

Tags: ,

Related posts

Industry Blogs are the “TMZ” of Online & Social Media Coverage

As I do my weekly “catch up” of RSS feed reading across a number of topics (online marketing, e-commerce, social media, etc.), I can’t help but notice the sensationalism, both positive and negative, around new products and companies entering the marketplace.

For example: Because I’ve been buried in doing actual work the past couple weeks, I first heard about Google Buzz through RSS feeds before getting the notification that it was ready for my Gmail account.

And judging by the RSS feeds, the type of coverage was akin to TMZ covering Jersey Shore cast news.

Oh my, people. Relax.

The early adopter community of these technologies get so caught up in overanalyzing every move in the industry that they lose sight of where these innovations and changes take us from a consumer perspective.

It makes me yearn for the format of a magazine that reports on industry news in a less timely format, but without all of the initial noise, gossip, and speculation woven into the article like I’m seeing so much of online.

Post to Twitter

No tags for this post.

Related posts

Social Media may be new, but local businesses have understood the concept forever

Successful small, local businesses thrive when they carve out their niche by catering to a local group of loyalists, develop deep relationships, and create customers for life.

Social Media has the potential for large companies to feel small and make each customer feel valued like local businesses have been doing for years.

My local dry cleaner

Each week when I drop off my dry cleaning at the local dry cleaner, the owner greets me by my first name. I’ve even seen the owner working out at the local gym and he still referred to me by my first name.

Making me feel valued and worth remembering

It’s one thing to see a customer’s vehicle pull into your parking lot giving you have a few moments to recall their name, it’s another to see the customer out of context and still remember their name.

It’s hard to explain how this feels as a customer to be remembered both in and outside of the business.

I have yet to feel this way after visiting or purchasing from a website.

Which is your social media strategy?

That of my local dry cleaner? Or something else:

There’s little in the relationship and loyalty department to be gained when your business’ Twitter account is for posting your cheapest products, your Facebook page is about acquiring the most followers, and your blog is filled with content designed for search engine rankings and not people.

Build a relationship, not a campaign

The point of Social Media is not to “build a list,” “go viral,” or “get impressions/mentions.” Social Media is not a campaign.

Social Media, done correctly, enables your business to intelligently connect with your loyalists to build deep relationships over time.

Post to Twitter

Tags:

Related posts

I sold my online business. I have mixed feelings, but made the right decision.

Over the ‘09 holiday break, I sold SuperMotors.net (a hobby-based automotive online business I ran with two long-time friends — here are previous blog posts about it) which I had run in some form or fashion since 1998.

(Old screenshot of the site — when Circuit City was still in business to be able to run banner ads)

It started as just a hobby

From ‘98-’02 it truly was a hobby, funded entirely by the money out of our pockets with no real plan in place. We knew we had something unique because people kept coming to the site, registering, loading up their vehicle information, pictures, sounds, and videos — all by word of mouth. But man, it was an expensive hobby to have, even with costs split between the three of us.

It became a business (but a part-time one)

In ‘03 we officially became a Limited Liability Company, setup a business banking account, had company credit cards, designed and printed company business cards, had a company phone line, mailing address, and made a run at selling banner advertising inventory for the ad space on the site.

A trip to SEMA to visit existing and potential sponsors, trips to local car shows, and continuous involvement in the enthusiast community with our own hobby-based vehicles continued to get the word out.

Startup.com was a truly inspiring documentary that we watched countless time during these years.

On the up-and-up

From ‘04-’05 we operated like a business: regular strategy meetings, constant site updates, new feature enhancements, active forums, and we had regular revenue coming in from sponsors, ad networks, and membership fees — it was exhilarating. I could see it someday becoming a full-time gig if we really wanted to make a run at it. We just lacked the financial stability to go at it on our own for an extended period of time.

The day jobs take prescedence

In ‘06 I moved from Minnesota to North Carolina to pursue a career in online marketing with a Fortune 500 company. Essentially, I had found a day job doing exactly what was so exciting about SuperMotors.net. Being an online site, we felt that we could continue to run the hobby-based-business-that-we-secretly-hoped-would-be-a-full-time-business-someday as if the distance between us would not matter.

It mattered, and in a big way.

Web 2.0 was blowing up and our site was stagnant

The Web 2.0 hoopla was blowing up, web technology was crazy, and hosting was becoming cheaper by the minute — all things that should have contributed to a healthier bottom line, new and innovative features, but they didn’t. My two friends and I were no longer meeting regularly. My move away from the business’ home state had made it extremely difficult to collaborate.

The day jobs were getting more exciting, too.

In 2008, we decided to sell.

The decision to sell

This was a tough, tough decision. By this point, we had 10 years into the site both as a hobby and a business. We knew what we had on our hands, but we did not have the means to take it to the next level that we wanted to — and it was beginning to show. Site updates and feature enhancements were nonexistent. Support requests from our members would go unanswered for weeks. The site was stuck on cruise control at 40 MPH in a 75 MPH speed zone.

Falling victim to the economy

Our buyer in 2008 had to bail on the deal as we were closing in on a finalized sales agreement. So much time had passed since our decision to sell and when we drew up the papers that the economy had gone south, and so did the buyer’s ability to finance the purchase. Up until this point, I had dodged the bad economy impact, but it became real when something as small as our website was a victim of the economy going south. Who knew?

Maybe we just weren’t ready to sell. Did we have a renewed interest in the site? Was this the kick in the pants we needed?

Several months had passed after the deal fell through and it was clear that it was still the right move for us to sell.

Selling the business was the most difficult business decision

The decision to sell (again) was tough. It’s not like we were living off of the site — we weren’t. We all had day jobs. At this point, we had not continued dialogue with sponsors and the site was running break-even. But it was the potential of what could be that was so enticing about the site and what was so troubling about the decision to sell. The “what if’s” plagued us.

Admitting “I can’t make this happen”

I had to objectively look at things. When I did this, it gave me the clarity I needed: I was not going to make this site into the success I hoped and knew it could be. I couldn’t do it.

When you say this to yourself about something that essentially is within your control, it’s a very difficult realization. But, on the flip-side, I have a successful career and the experience in setting up a business, operating a site, meeting with customers, interacting with the end-users — it has all contributed to my professional experience and I had fun while doing it.

It was time to let somebody else do this. And by letting go, I was doing a favor to our end-users who had stuck with us for so long.

It’s sold

As I write this, it’s been nearly two weeks since selling the site. It didn’t become real until I could no longer access the server or had control of the domains. It’s on odd feeling, but there is a sense of relief that the site is in better and more capable hands now than it has been in a couple years. I no longer have a guilty conscience as I look in my inbox — there are no more unanswered customer and/or end-user emails that I tell myself “I’ll get to this weekend.”

In the end, I made the right decision and have no regrets.

Post to Twitter

Tags:

Related posts

A commoditized business should focus product innovation on user experience and ease of use

After CNN.com launched their redesign in October (before & after screenshots and analysis here), I found myself without a convenient home for news relevant to my interests and attention span.

Old design = 20 headlines to scan. New design = 72 headlines to scan.

Previously, CNN.com provided a 2-headline synopsis of across 10 categories and at any given time throughout the day, I could visit their homepage and get a quick run-down of all that was going on in the world.

With the latest redesign, this quick run-down became much more time-consuming. And there was no way to tailor the news categories to my preferences. The previous website didn’t offer this option either and was less important, but the new design now features 6 headlines across 12 categories.

That’s 72 headlines I now have to scan as opposed to the previous 20 headlines. This is a huge increase in content and considerably more “work” to scan.

Google’s “news” personalization, simplicity, and path of least resistance wins

I ventured upon news.google.com and found it quite easy to personalize the sections I am interested as well as sort them in the order of importance I want them to be in. This feature in itself was enough to win me over — the way in which they aggregate news from multiple publications is also a benefit.

CNN.com’s one-size-fits-all approach to homepage news doesn’t appeal to me anymore. I’ve abandoned them because I’ve found an alternate service that meets my needs. What’s interesting is CNN provides unique content but this is not enough to win me over because it’s too difficult to get the information I desire quickly.

A commoditized business should focus product innovation on user experience and ease of use

“News” as a product is commoditized and is partially why newspapers are on the decline. If the product research or delivery mechanism doesn’t cater to the changing needs of consumers or customers, then business will be lost to the competitive set. This concept applies to virtually all business, and not just news websites.

CNN.com offers a beautiful new redesign, but has chosen a path that devalues consumers who share my news-consumption preference. I don’t know if this is intentional or not, but through further insight-gathering and subsequent innovation with their website, they would recapture my interest.

Post to Twitter

Tags: , ,

Related posts