Shake-up at WebTrends; Omniture’s acquisitions and customer service

This year has been a good year for Omniture customers -- seeing their favorite web analytics vendor gobble up other businesses such as TouchClarity, Offermatica, and Visual Sciences. The recent shake-up at WebTrends as outlined by webmetricsguru.com, poses a lot of questions for web analytics customers.
We're actually in a unique position being both a WebTrends and Omniture customer. We use the WebTrends Dynamic Search product for SEM management and optimization. I would love to see Omniture acquire WebTrends so we can stop dancing around separate reporting for the WebTrends Dynamic Search product. However, it doesn't look like an acquisition of WebTrends will be a reality. Oh well, for now.
Omniture's Challenge: Information Architecture and UI
Included in webmetricsguru.com posting is the following:
I told Josh that I've worked with Omniture some, recently, but found the platform, while it can do everything, doesn't always do it elegantly - he responded that I should be using the newer technology Omniture has come up with - not the older stuff; I replied the newer stuff (IE: Discover 2) is very expensive and not everyone can afford it.
The above comment couldn't be further from the truth. The good thing about Omniture is it can do whatever you want. The bad thing about Omniture is it can do whatever you want. It can be a very complex system and for us, we have actually done 2 implementations. The first round established the basics, and after 2 months of being in production, we fine-tuned the implementation considerably after we learned more about the intricacies of the tool.
Taking a page out of the Google Analytics book
Omniture should take a page out of the Google Analytics book and check out the report designs, navigation, and general user interface of this free product. Omniture is a complex interface for the average business user. Google seems to master the ability to create interfaces that most users can figure out without any knowledgebases, tech support, or training. There is power in this and it's why Google is good at what they do. If Omniture could start adopting some of this thinking their SiteCatalyst UI, it'd be a great start.
Omniture's other challenge: Timely Customer Service & Support
What I really, really, really would like to see is for Omniture to focus on improving their customer support. Phone support is speedy, but rarely resolves in a question being answered if the problem is complex and doesn't involve basic functionality of their application. This is not to downplay the expertise of their tech support -- it's just that each customer's implementation is different and it takes time to dig into some issues. Perfectly understandable.
However, e-mail support is terrible. I'm not really sure why they offer it because the response rate is, on average, a week for basic requests (which can be handled on-the-fly with a single phone call). Support requests that require higher-tier support go unanswered for several weeks. It often takes an e-mail to our account manager to get an update that is more detailed than "we are working on the problem." As a customer, we feel like they are either blowing off our follow-up inquiries about open tickets or their support system does not do a satisfactory job at escalating stale tickets in the queue. Coming from an agency and project management background, this is a big no-no.
Soliciting Feedback from Customers
There are several usability issues throughout their interfaces. Nothing that prevents you from getting your work done, but just design issues that force you to do a lot of extra clicking. This, combined with the continued frustration we run into with support inquiries makes me believe they would really benefit from using OpinionLab or any feedback tool for that matter. My single biggest complaint is that it feels like there is no venue for customers to provide feedback.
kudos to omniture for monitoring blogs
Bonus Points for Omniture
Unbeknownst to me, last week as I was testing out this new installation of WordPress blogging software, a post I made which referenced Omniture would make its way into a few blog feeds and someone from Omniture would actually take notice -- and better yet, take action. In the post, I indicated some frustration with the UI and setting up reporting and that I was considering giving Clickshift.com a try at SEM needs. Today I received a call from our SearchCenter contact and we talked through some of the details of the post and he showed me how to create some business rules to solve a problem I was having.
In the business of tracking: clicks -> conversions to free samples -> offline sales
I explained that my goal right now, since we do not sell products via our website, was to maximize the conversions from visitor to free sample ordering. From the sample ordering data we collect, we can determine the percentage of sample orders that convert into offline purchasers. Fortunately for our business model, we sell custom products, which means orders are placed directly with us, regardless of retailer. The manufactured blind makes its way to the consumer, so we can simply match the shipping address of a product order against our database of addresses we collect for free sample ordering. (All of this is obviously done under our privacy policy and consumer data is kept under lock & key.)
Ahhh...the cost/conversion metric I had been looking for
Anyway, since we do not sell products online, we thus have no online revenue to track, which makes some of the default reporting within Omniture's SearchCenter product useless to us -- in particular ROAS (Return on Ad Spend). What I am looking to do is reduce our cost per conversion (cost per swatch order). This metric did require our account rep to setup a custom setting on his end to enable us to better report against it, but at the end of the call, I had cost/conversion reporting setup and was on my way to creating business rules for our search engine bids.
FWIW, cost/conversion is a default metric available in Google's free web analytics. It seems like somewhat of an oversight to omit this metric from the default reporting, but I guess that Omniture's clients typically are e-commerce businesses that rely on ROAS metrics since they have online revenue to also inject into reporting (at which point cost/conversion is less critical).
Herein lies the delimma: OPTIMIZING keyword campaigns on cost per conversion
Clickshift.com's model automatically optimizes entire campaigns based on keywords that drive the best cost per conversion. Additionally, Clickshift.com also optimizes based on landing page.
Omniture's system is not so automated or all-encompassing (yet). Omniture's reporting is able to TELL me what keywords are driving for cost/conversion, but only through arbitrary automated increments (that I specify based on no data/research) can I enforce increases or decreases in bid spending. Furthermore, Omniture's support for A/B(/C/D/E...n) landing pages is a little more involved that Clickshift. Technically, it can be done, but requires tagging pages specifically, and doesn't really offer the complete solution that Clickshift.com is selling businesses on. I would have to separately test landing pages and keyword campaigns and assemble my own findings between the two. I can't just automatically disable landing pages or move my bids to another style of landing page automatically. Omniture's business rules currently allow one action to be taken at a time...and landing pages can only be manually changed.
Net/Net: I'll make further attempts at creating additional business rules (within Omniture) for bid automation based on average ad position, cost/conversion, and other criteria I deem necessary. We'll see how much further I can drive down cost/conversion. And I'm very pleased at the level of customer service from Omniture.

