More Comparison Shopping Woes

As we continue to fine-tune the usability and comparison shopping on our site, I’m also paying close attention to how other manufacturers are executing as well.

After traveling over the past few weeks, I’ve been privy to sleeping on several different beds in hotels, friend’s homes, and family members’ homes. My wife and I need a new bed as ours has developed half-pipe indentations (who really enjoys flipping and rotating a king-size mattress every month?).

tempurpedic.jpg

Tempur-Pedic has been pouring money into marketing dollars on this half of the year — at least I feel like we’ve been seeing their ads more often (certainly more than the Sleep Number bed). For some reason I just cannot mentally buy into the sleep number bed, so I took a gander at the Tempur-Pedic offering this morning on their website. I never knew buying a bed was so confusing. Let’s start at the product page for their “sleep systems”:

tempurpedic-beds.jpg

Wow, 9 different beds to choose from just based on the primary feature alone. They’ve at least given them unique names, but I have no idea which one is right for me. Oh wait, there’s a comparison option, great, let’s check that out:

tempurpedic-comparison.jpg

Ouch, look at all of these options and names that mean absolutely nothing to me. What is the difference between a Quilted TEMPUR-HD and a Quiltend TEMPUR “comfort layer? What about the diference between the Grand AirFlow System and T-Flex Support System as the base layer? Can these options not be combined? What if I want both of them in one bed?

Comparison Shopping Flaws
The fatal flaw this website makes is that it does not SELL me on the “WHY?”. It is a brochure which assumes intimate knowledge of the differences in products and what each of the features means (it comes across as an assisted-sale tool for sales people). The comparison page should add clarity to the products offered, not additional confusion. If there are confusing terminologies and/or features, then at least provide pop-up windows or links to definitions of the features that provide feature and benefit statements for the consumer. This Tempur-Pedic comparison page does neither.

How we’re testing comparison shopping
We have an initial implementation of comparison shopping between product models of blinds and shades. The added benefit we provide are descriptions of product options listed on the comparison page.

levolor-comparison.jpg

I’ve received more information from a commercial about the Tempur-Pedic “sleep system” than I did on their website.

Additionally, pricing is also available on our page, too, so the consumer can determine if they are even in the right ballpark for their budget. This was another thing I noticed that was missing from the Tempur-Pedic comparison page — I have no idea what the cost ranges are for their product. While I expect to spend a decent amount of money, I’m unable to determine generally what that amount is going to be. Do you shop for cars online without seeing the price? Probably not.

Provide the context in which the feature is beneficial to the consumer
One thing I’ve found is marketers are not the best salesmen. They do a great job at drawing you into the store to take a look at the product, but a big part of online marketing is also selling. I expected to go to the Tempur-Pedic site to find exactly the right bed for me based on the features and benefits of those features of their various offerings. All I’ve taken away is that there are 9 models and I probably need to go to a store to find out more information from a real salesmen on which bed is right for me. Frustrating.

We’re getting there, but it’s not perfect…yet
While I don’t believe we have perfected the model in our online store, we are certainly learning from consumers, soliciting feedback, and analyzing site usage reports to determine how people are currently shopping vs. how they want to shop. Manfacturing companies like us tend to be far too feature-focused instead of being benefit focused. This is forcing companies like ours and like Tempur-Pedic to change their method of selling and marketing of products — which is a good thing.

I think many companies get in their own way when trying to communicate to the consumer — this further stresses the importance of usability testing both from a site architecture standpoint as well as a marketing/selling standpoint. The site may be fully usable, but at the end of the day, is it influencing a sale or better yet, is it converting a browser to a buyer? Tempur-Pedic has yet to convert me.

Post to Twitter

Tags: , ,

Related posts

Automotive manufacturers don’t quite get comparison shopping

If you watch Sunday night football (or any football, for that matter), you’ll be bombarded with plenty of commercials — especially automotive commercials. Since I’m a self-described “car guy,” I took interest in the Mercedes C-class commercials that have been airing recently touting the new styling and design “starting in the low $30’s.”

Little did I know that I was in for a frustrating experience when I visited the Mercedes website! This frustration carried over to BMWusa.com as well as Ford.com when I started comparing the BMW 300 series and the Ford Expeditions (the new car bug has bitten me since the smashing of the rear window of our SUV this past weekend).

The frustration with Mercedes’ website

mercedes-models.jpg

I have historically owned American-made vehicles. Navigating a foreign car company’s website (even though it was the USA site) proved interesting as things are just a little “different.” The main frustration with Mercedes was lack of product descriptions with their models. Not being a previous Mercedes owner, I have no idea what the different classes are. Foreign vehicles tend to be named by their literal model names (i.e. C300 Sport Sedan, C300 Luxury Sedan, C350 Sport Sedan, and so on) vs. American vehicles which are typically named “real” names (i.e. Ford Expedition, Ford Mustang, Ford Escape).

Lack of comparison shopping
Model name nomenclature aside, what is most frustrating is the lack of comparison options for Mercedes. Even within the C-class, I am presented with 3 models, C300 Sport Sedan, C300 Luxury Sedan, and the C350 Sport Sedan. All 3 are sedans and two of them are “sports.” I was forced to specifically navigate each of the model pages and subsequent technical specs to fully understand the differences between the 3 models. This is a major no-no on websites — especially on sites trying to sell you an expensive automobile. While I’m making a large investment, I still expect comparison shopping tools be to available to me on a $30-$50k car as I would on a $200-$300 iPod. Nowhere was I able to see a side-by-side comparison of all of the options available on the various models to determine which model was right for me.

BMW suffers from the same “model overload”

bmw-models.jpg

BMW suffers from the same model vagueness as Mercedes, but is arguably worse. With 12 models within the “3 Series,” at this point, it is information overload. Again, not familiar with BMW at all, I have no idea what the difference is between the feature and benefits of all 12 models. Simple descriptions such as Coupe, Sedan, and Convertible help narrow it down, and since I’m interested in Sedans, this fortunately limits my choices down to only 4 models. But these 4 models are: 328i, 328xi, 335i, 335xi. As I later found, the “x” is for all-wheel-drive and is positioned as its own model, and not an option within a model, which I found to be non-consumer friendly. Again, the lack of side-by-side comparison shopping of the models forced me to spend extra time navigating the site to find the answers I needed.

Ford also lacks the necessary comparison tools, too

ford-expedition.jpg

Ford too, despite its more obvious naming convention (i.e. Ford Expedition), suffers from the same model overload problem. There are 8 different Expedition models to choose from, ranging from starting prices of $30k all the way up to $42k.

While there is a comparison feature on the screen shot above, it is nowhere near comprehensive enough to understand the incremental differences between XLT, Eddie Bauer, Limited, and King Ranch. For years I have owned Fords, so I generally know the XLT is entry-level, but I don’t know what makes the Limited “worth” $3000 more than the Eddie Bauer.

Gaining a specific understanding and navigating further down the purchase funnel
Each of these sites suffer from comparison tools that prevent the consumer from gaining a specific understanding of options/features/benefits of models compared to one another. They suffer from the assumption that consumers are intimately familiar with the meanings of the various models simply by literal model names. For consumers just entering the segment, this is not the case. The C-class and 300-series models are generally entry-level Mercedes and BMWs, respectively, so they should particularly cater to the needs of an unfamiliar audience.

Does your site have the comparison tools consumers require?
With all of this said, it is important to take a look at your site, regardless of whether you’re selling online or not. If I were to visit a dealership, these subtle differences between car models can probably be easily explained by a salesman in a matter of seconds. This same information and selling assistance needs to be made available on a website, too.

Post to Twitter

Tags: ,

Related posts