eBusinessBlog.org Leveraging marketing & technology to solve business problems.

20Feb/070

Tribal Fusion IS willing to work with social media sites

Posted by Eric Long

In regards to yesterday's post, Tribal Fusion did respond to my e-mail inquiry with the following:

I appreciate your willingness to work with us in maintaining our standard of quality content. To answer your question on how we could potentially work together on user-generated-content, there are two possibilities:

  1. All content would be reviewed by staff before it is published live on the site.
  2. As you mentioned, YouTube does allow users to flag content as “inappropriate”, and then reviews all flagged content. However, they also mark all uploaded content as inappropriate until it has received a certain number of views. If, in that time, no user flags the image, it is marked as safe. If a user does flag the content, it is pulled and reviewed.

This is good news for us and also a good indicator that they are willing to work with social media sites. We're working towards a "flag as inappropriate" feature a la YouTube for our user-generated content. More on this as we continue to work with Tribal Fusion. For now, we're on the right path towards getting back on their network.

Tags: ,

20Feb/071

Tribal Fusion not accomodating towards (some) social media sites

Posted by Eric Long

Tribal Fusion

At the risk of poo-pooing any chance at rekindling our relationship with Tribal Fusion, we (SuperMotors) were taken back by an e-mail we received from our (new) account executive on Friday morning, February 16th and 3:23 AM. In what appears to have been a standard form letter used to contact sites that have "fallen below the standards of the Tribal Fusion ad network," we were notified that adult content was found on SuperMotors.net and that this was in fact a violation of the Tribal Fusion Terms of Service. This as the first such notification in our almost 5-month relationship with Tribal Fusionnnn.

Fair enough. They have every right to be monitoring the quality of their websites and I applaud them for enforcing this. This is what we received:

Hello Eric,

I am contacting you because it is our belief that the quality of the content on SuperMotors has fallen below the standards of the Tribal Fusion ad network. In particular, the content found on these pages:

(page link removed)

Content like this is a violation of our publisher contract; and as a result SuperMotors has been removed from the Tribal Fusion Marketplace and we are currently serving only defaults or PSAs. We value the relationship we have had with you up to this point, and if you would like to speak with us regarding ways to potentially continue working together, please don't hesitate to contact me. Otherwise, I have to ask you to please remove Tribal Fusion's ad code from the SuperMotors website and/or from your adserving system by the end of the week. Failure to do so will result in broken images appearing through our ad tags.The clause in our publisher contract for termination (for your reference):

6.2 Termination. Publisher may discontinue participating in the marketplace after the initial term by providing 30 days written notice to Tribal Fusion™. However, Publisher has an obligation to fulfill any advertising campaign configured to run on their site in its entirety prior to termination. Tribal Fusion™ may terminate a Publisher's participation at any time if Publisher's website quality falls below the standard set by other websites in the marketplace, fails to deliver the minimum number of impressions, or if Publisher fails to comply with any other provision of these Terms and Conditions.

2.2 Right to Refuse. Tribal Fusion™ reserves the right to refuse to accept any publisher at its sole discretion, as a member of the Tribal Fusion™ Marketplace. Publisher websites shall not contain (or have direct links to) any content deemed inappropriate by Tribal Fusion™ at its sole discretion, which includes but is not limited to the following: content promoting the use of alcohol, tobacco or illegal substances; sex, pornography or adult-oriented content; violence, expletives or inappropriate language; content promoting illegal activity such as copyright infringement, racism, hate, mail fraud, spam, pyramid schemes, investment opportunities or other advice not permitted under applicable law; content that is libelous, defamatory, contrary to public policy or otherwise unlawful.
Should you have any questions regarding this issue, feel free to contact me

Since adult content is also a violation of our own Terms of Service, we immediately removed the material referenced in the link they provided us (which had been available online for less than 24 hours), issued the offending user a "strike 1" (we utilize a "3 strikes and you're out" policy for our users) via e-mail, and responded to Tribal Fusion informing them the matter had been resolved. My follow-up e-mail:

Thank you for bringing this issue to my attention. We have removed this photo as well as another photo from this user's account that were in violation of our terms of service as well as Tribal Fusion's. We take issues like this very seriously and have sent the user a warning about posting future content like this.

SuperMotors.net is a site with user-generated content. Due to the volume of newly posted photos every day, it is impossible for us to monitor each and every photo, sound, and video for quality. For this reason, we rely on our members to help us police other user-generated content (pictures, sounds, videos, comments, forum posts, blog entries, etc.). We have a clause in our terms of service which specifically states that adult content is not allowed to be posted and if it is, it will be deleted and a warning will be issued to the user. If the user is found to violate this rule a second time, their account is temporarily suspended. A third time results in permanent account deletion, along with all of their posted content.

The image at the URL below was posted on 2/15/07, less than 24 hours ago. I hope that we can be reinstated and continue to be a part of the Tribal Fusion ad network as we have now resolved this issue as soon as we were made aware of it.

To our surprise, there is no leniency. My intent on this follow-up e-mail was more to issue a formal apology and to state that, "Yes, hosting adult photos is not how we do business, nor is it something we permit." The response from Tribal Fusion:

Unfortunately we cannot have our ads running on unmonitored user-generated content. We have looked at your site more closely and have found numerous pages with this type of content. Because of this, we will be forced to deactivate your account. I have decategorized your site so you should now be showing either PSAs or the defaults you have set up in our system. Later today, I will have to deactivate your account completely. At that time you will serve error messages.

I apologize for the inconvenience.

So, in a span of just 12 hours, this revenue source has completely gone away. While Tribal Fusion isn't our primary source of income, we are diversified enough among our own sponsorship dollars, subscribers, and Google AdSense, it still is an unplanned loss of revenue especially entering a weekend on a record-setting month for us. Revenue is still revenue, and we really take this seriously. Finding another ad network is not only time-consuming, but really painful when a company like Tribal Fusion is regarded as one of the best in the industry. How and why would we want to switch in the first place?

YouTube

I did some further digging and looked other sites in the Tribal Fusion Automotive Channel. One of them is YouTube.com. I proceeded to reply to the message above explaining that even YouTube.com, backed by Google, is unable to deal with the overwhelming demand of user-generated content. They do their best by implementing a "report as inappropriate" link on every posted video to allow the community to help report offensive content. We've all seen the headlines that YouTube has droves and droves of copyrighted material. There currently isn't a magic formula to policing user-generated content other than providing the necessary tools for the community to report inappropriate content and to deal with it in a timely manner (if you or your staff don't discover it on your own).
Another site, which shall remain nameless, has one of the racy Tribal Fusion Ad Network Ads for True.com dating service running on a page where there is a link to view illegal street racing videos as seen in this screen shot:

Tribal Fusion Ad

It just seems that we are being held to unreasonable standards when other sites on the Tribal Fusion Automotive Network are obviously violating the Terms of Service. We fixed the problem on our end in a timely manner and are more than willing to work towards a better solution that will keep Tribal Fusion happy and more importantly, their clients (advertisers) happy.

I've asked Tribal Fusion how we can strive to meet their standards for providing sufficient moderation for on a user-generated content site. Unfortunately, our account exec is unreachable for the next two weeks, so I will be attempting to get a hold of another account exec this week to see if we can't come to an agreement. It really seems like this is a misunderstanding. Maybe my e-mail was interpreted as "we don't moderate our user-generated content?" Regardless, we can modify our moderating policies and procedures to meet Tribal Fusions needs. I just hope they are open to making this consideration.

Tags: , ,

5Jan/071

Quantcast Internet Ratings – A publisher & advertiser’s dream

Posted by Eric Long

Quantcast.com

MarketingVOX ran a blurb today on a new company called Quantcast. Quantcast is described as follows:

Quantcast is the world's first open internet ratings service. Advertisers can find reports on the audiences of a half million web sites here. Publishers can ensure their sites are represented accurately by tagging them for direct measurement. The service is free to everyone.

This service is what Google Analytics (light-weight, free web analytics) is to Omniture SiteCatalyst (heavy-duty web analytics). It functions on a similar methodology of partnering with ISPs for aggregate data and crossing it with panel data to provide a higher-level overview of your target audience such as:

  • Gender
  • Age
  • Household income
  • Ethnicity
  • Head of household education
  • Children

This is similar to the data that Hitwise provides, but the very tip of the iceberg and best of all, free. Where it's extremely valuable is you can analyze the stats of other sites (partners, competitors, potential sponsors, etc.). Hitwise, through their contractual structure, will typically limit your reach within the data to just the pre-defined categories that sites are lumped into. Hitwise also provides a much deeper dive into the data. Quantcast is a superb service for small-to-medium sized businesses.

Sitegraphics & Common Audience (I love these!)
What is also provides is a snapshot of the sites that index well against your audience (the "Sitegraphics" feature). Additionally, it also provides a list of sites that your audience also visits. Check out the snapshot of SuperMotors.net here. Unfortunately, we changed domain names in July of '06, so there's only 5 months of data (their stats go through November 2006 thus far), so the data isn't 100% accurate. I have however added their tracking code to SuperMotors.net in an effort to paint a more accurate picture of our visitors.

What value does this provide?
As a site owner, this is a very powerful tool, particularly if you sell your own advertising inventory. On SuperMotors, while we run Tribal Fusion and Google AdSense ads, we also have our own ad serving system and subsequently sell inventory in it. We do not have a dedicated sales force, so we rely heavily on ad networks for revenue. That said, selling our own inventory offers the greatest ROI.

In looking at the "Common Audience" chart:

quantcast common audience

We have data that supports which sites our visitors also frequent -- thus we have data to bring to potential sponsors to help sell ad inventory
Here we see where our visitors are also going. I know of a lot of these sites and personally visit them quite often. You can see a trend of Ford and Bronco-related sites, primarily because our userbase indexes heavily towards those makes and models of automobiles. Those sites aside, we also see retailer sites such as Summit Racing, 4 Wheel Parts, Edelbrock, Bronco Graveyard, James Duff, and BC Broncos. Fortunately for us, Bronco Graveyard is already a sponsor on SuperMotors.net (where we sold directly out of our inventory). We now have data that can help us craft a story to approach these other retailers and manufacturers. This shows that our visitors also visit their sites. This has nothing to do with referring links, it simply tells us over time that these sites are also visited by our members.

But, if they're already visiting these retail/manufacturer sites, why would they want to advertise on SuperMotors.net? They already are getting the traffic.
Sure, this argument could be made. However, one of the driver's behind choosing where to advertise is qualifying the sites you advertise on. What better way than to advertise on sites that you know is already a match for some of your consumers. Leverage this demographical data and expand your reach to this network that is already proving it has qualified consumers.

As a sponsor or someone who spends ad dollars, this tool is great to identify sites on which you would consider advertising on.
On the flip-side of this coin, this also means we could pursue partnership opportunities with the non-retail sites who have visitors that use our services. Perhaps even we would advertise on these sites to further promote our services. We are much better off advertising where we already have advocates than trying from ground zero. The same holds true for retailers who are looking to advertise online. Examine the sites where your users are currently visiting and tap into the visitor bases of those sites.

Moral of the story: Use data to support your advertising pitches
Ad networks frequently approach advertisers and pitch them on demographics, ages, incomes, education, and all of the metrics that align with an advertiser's target market. If you sell your own advertising on your site like we do, use this tool to identify potential sponsors and leverage the data in your sales pitch. It's a much more compelling if visitor data shows that users who visit Yoursite.com also visit TheSponsorYouWant.com. It's hard for a potential sponsor to tell you, "no" because it's hard to argue against data. This levels the playing field for you if you're a smaller company -- get them hooked with the data and talk about the sponsorship package you can put together for them.

Tags: ,

2Dec/061

apache mod_deflate reduces bandwidth usage by 27% on SuperMotors.net

Posted by Eric Long

In the ongoing battle of optimizing, tweaking, and testing, in November we enabled apache's mod_deflate module on SuperMotors.net. Literally adding about 10 lines of code to httpd.conf (the apache config file), all text-based content on our pages now use gzip compression when delivered to web browsers that support gzip compression. By using this tool, you can see if your site currently utilizes gzip compression. When testing SuperMotors.net with this tool, our homepage size was originally 49K, but with gzip compression thanks to mod_deflate, it is reduced to 9K. This is an 81% savings in bandwidth usage.

So, when implemented over the course of the entire month, we saw an overall 27% reduction in bandwidth. Surprisingly, our absolute unique visitor count was down 14% for November (holidays do this to our site), but page views actually increased by 1%. Page views are ultimately the driver in bandwidth utilization. I interpret this to mean that fewer users were able to do more on our site because they were downloading content in less amount of time.

So, why does the test tool from above show an 81% reduction in bandwidth yet we only saw an overall reduction of 27%? This is because images (and other files) are not compressed when delivered to web clients. Since we primarily serve images and videos, the rest of our bandwidth still remains largely untouched by mod_deflate -- which is by design.

This bandwidth reduction is very good news for us. As previously posted, we are leaving the world of colocation and moving to managed hosting -- with a new billing model. The "total bandwidth used" billing model favors us even more now that we've reduced bandwidth usage by 27%. This translates into squeezing more data out of the pipe than previously anticipated. We'll be able to maintain our fixed costs and increase revenue, thanks to this little module. The more data we push out, the more page views we serve, and the more revenue we make from our CPM-based advertising model with Tribal Fusion and our in-house ad inventory (read the challenges we face when we introduce Ajax functionality and how it'll affect our CPM-based ad model).

The mod_deflate module does increase CPU usage due to the need to compress each page sent out. However, this had very little impact on us as we had plenty of processing power to spare. Your results may vary, so keep an eye on CPU usage when you implement this module. The slight increase in CPU usage was worth the risk, because the 27% reduction in bandwidth was a much bigger gain for us.

12/4/06 Edit: Ajaxian has an article on gzip compression with some user responses. Interesting insights (in the comments section) on the law of diminishing returns with gzip compression used on ajax-enabled pages. 

Tags: , , , ,

1Dec/060

Page views out. How to monetize Ajax-enabled sites on a CPM ad model?

Posted by Eric Long

In this post, the author predicts 4 more years until the "page view" metric is no more and advertisers/publishers are scrambling to find other ways to measure traffic on a site. This is something I have had in the back of my mind as well. While I'm not interested in attaching a timeline-to-extinction to the page view metric, it is of legitimate concern to us on SuperMotors. We generate revenue via user subscriptions (for advanced site features) and banner advertising. We sell our own banner space but also rely on the likes of Tribal Fusion and Google AdSense to fill our unsold inventory (and there's a lot of it!). What's interesting is that with Ajax, you essentially eliminate the need for several page views to navigate a site quickly and easily. Granted, pages will still need to remain, but certain functionality within pages definitely can take advantage of Ajax.

For example, we allow users to post media files to their accounts on SuperMotors. Here is the hierarchy of clicks (from the home page) to post 1 picture, sound, or video:

  1. (From Homepage) click "My Garage"
  2. Choose "Edit Album" from your list of registry entries (vehicles, atvs, boats, etc.)
  3. Choose the album section to add to, or create a new one
  4. Select the file you wish to post, click submit.
  5. Site refreshes. Repeat for each file. (it should be noted that subscribers can post more files at a time and use drag & drop functionality we have implemented, thus requireing fewer page views at this step)

Including the visit to the homepage and the 5 page views above, that's 6 total page views. Each page view displays 2 advertisements for our site. That's 10 total ads being displayed in the course of posting one photo. Add 2 page views for each additional photo/file posted. Our members have posted nearly 300,000 photos, sounds, and videos -- over time, this adds up to significant revenue from CPM-based advertising campaigns like Tribal Fusion and our in-house ads.

Now, enter Ajax (which we will be implementing in the next 2-3 months). Ajax could potentially eliminate page refreshes on steps 3-5, thus bringing total page views down from 10 (for 1 file posting) to 3 (for 1 file posting), with no additional page views generated for each file posted. Makes for a superb user experience but at the cost of sacrificing advertising revenue.

So, how do we measure this traffic and use of the website? Or do we? From an analytics standpoint, yes, I want to measure the use of our site even through Ajax functionality so we can determine if users like it, are stumbling with it, or if it doesn't work at all. From an ad revenue standpoint, Tribal Fusion and Google AdSense policies state that you can't automatically refresh ad units on a page. So, do we include ad units within the Ajax functionality? There are technically many screens passing by and that's a lot of potential advertisements to expose a user to, just like we do today with our page view/non-ajax model. Where's the happy medium?

So, for any site selling ads based on CPM, Ajax is a double-edged sword. Increase usability, decrease revenue.

So, what will the new metric be on Ajax-enabled websites (or Ajax-enabled features within a site)? Time spent on site? Will ads run in 15, 30, or 60-second allotments, similar to television? How will you prevent someone from just leaving a page open forever and allowing ads to rotate through? I'm excited to introduce Ajax to our user base to see how they react to it and also to see how we can best create the best of both worlds: improved usability & sustained revenue.

Tags: , , ,