Mass Customization, Considered Purchases, & Mental Models – Why Usability & Content Strategy Matter
I've been wanting to write a post about Mass Customization, Considered Purchases, and Mental Models for some time, but find it challenging to articulate the divide these concepts create. They are like an oxymoron, of sorts. Here we go:
What is Mass Customization and what are its Benefits?
Mass Customization is the process of providing the low unit costs of mass production with the flexibility of individual customization (definition modified from Wikipedia's Mass Customization entry). Essentially, this means delivering customized products to each end-user based on their own design -- and on a mass-scale. Typically, high-level customization occurs on a small scale due to complexity with technology, manufacturing, supply chain, and/or product design.
Some industries however do benefit from advances in these key functions and are capable of providing mass customization to the masses. The capabilities in and of themselves however, do not automatically equal success. The purchase process also plays a key role in the ability to market, merchandise, and sell mass customized products.
What is a Considered Purchase?
A Considered Purchase is one where the product or service purchased is durable, long-lasting, and of solid benefit and enduring value. Products or services that are a considered purchased are owned over a long period of time (definition derived from http://www.smithdahmer.com/content/difference-and-truth-about-considered-purchase). This means the frequency of purchase is low, but the level of engagement is high when the end-user has arrived at the point of purchase decision.
What is a Mental Model?
A mental model is an explanation of someone's thought process about how something works in the real world. Mental models help shape behavior and set an approach to solving problems and doing tasks (definition derived from Wikipedia's Mental Model entry). Mental models are developed with exposure to a problem or task, so the less frequent the exposure means a more simplistic mental model if the problem or task is complex in nature.
The Role of a Sales Associate in Considered Purchases
In an environment where mass customization and considered purchases are a reality, simplistic mental models interfere with the end-user's ability to successfully comprehend the choices they are presented with and therefore they require a significant amount of help to reap the benefits of mass customization and to achieve satisfaction with their considered purchase. Help may come in the way of a sales associate who is a seasoned expert. This is why many considered purchases are accompanied by a professional sales associate (buying a home, buying a car, buying flooring, etc.) because they are there to remove the roadblocks to purchasing.
Sales associates however, can be expensive to retain and keep trained if products and services that are considered purchases change regularly. Additionally, the departure of an expert sales associate, or a high turnover rate of sales associates can wreak havoc on the success of your ability to sell considered purchase products because when end-users enter your environment trying to understand considered purchases without that associate's expertise to guide them (because of their simplistic mental models), they will be lost.
If not lost, they will not reap the benefits of mass customization in your products and will instead choose the path of least resistance because of their low confidence level and still-simplistic mental model. And at the end of it all, you will lose to lower margin competitors who offer the same basic features at cheaper prices.
Offering More Choice than a Mental Model was Built on
At the crux of mass customization benefits is giving end-users nearly limitless choices. This often means introducing possibilities that end-users previously did not know were available to them requiring them to stop and consider their purchase at each step of the way a new piece of information is presented. Herein lies the dilemma: offering more choice than a mental model was built on. How do end-users take advantage of the choice if their mental model wasn't designed to understand choice? How can you effectively expand the user's mental model without overwhelming them? And how is this all done without relying on a sales associate to facilitate the process?
Enter usability & content.
Why Usability & Content Strategy Matter
Usability is the ease of use and learnability of an object or process. Self-service systems are only successful when they are easy to use. "Easy to use" can take on several forms, and in an environment where simplistic mental models exist, mass customization is available, and the product or service is a considered purchase, usability must not only be viewed as an interface element, but as a means for providing a process around consuming content and further developing a mental model.
Content aids in educating an end-user, and expanding their mental model to develop an understanding of the choices available to them. The content developed for a user experience is as critical as the interface design elements that are responsible for aiding an end-user through a system.
UX Practitioners Will Excel in an Increasingly Digital World
It's not just a "marketing" project to have a website because ultimately, you are architecting a shopping process that draws on many areas of an organization to support. In traditional brick & mortar environments, you have store operations, store merchants, customer service...all experts in their areas of helping a customer through the shopping process in-store. Try and implement a new shopping experience in-store and these functions will be intimately involved and help you avoid land mines.
Vague shopping process familiarity exists in traditional Marketing roles
On the other hand, with Digital we typically see a marketing team with vague familiarity around the intricacies of the touch points of a shopping process trying to build comprehensive shopping experiences.
User Experience is not a marketing campaign
Because the rules of store operations, merchandising, and customer service are different in a digital world, we see little crossover in the expertise of these traditional departments, and marketing departments fall back on what they do best: campaigns. Making a big splash with a new idea, hoping it sticks, and moving onto the next budgeted initiative. The problem is that campaigns have a short life-span, and you never want to treat your digital experience like a campaign.
Enter the User Experience (UX) practioner
UX practitioners will excel now and into the foreseeable future as marketing departments in both retailers and brands work to bridge cross-channel shopping gaps with digital. It's these folks who will help map touch points from the traditional world to the digital world, and vice versa because they see the details so no stone is left unturned.
Experiences are never-ending
An experience is never-ending; campaigns and products do however come to an end. Marketing Departments must rid themselves of this mentality and embrace an era of User Experience design.
The Paradigm Shift for Product Organizations: Building Consumer Experiences
As I view the landscape of digital technology and how big brands are embracing new ways to reach consumers, one thing is evident: this is clearly a paradigm shift for product-centric organizations who are historically reliant on the retailer to construct the shopping experience.
For years, manufacturers build product, sell it into a retailer, and wipe their hands of most responsibilities after the fact -- often focusing on promotional calendars to help drive point of sale with some arm's length control over point of purchase signage.
As the shift to building experiences becomes more of a priority for brands and manufacturers, they find themselves with an organizational structure and culture that may be highly unprepared for what it takes to embrace this new experience-driven mentality.
These are exciting times for consumers as retailers and manufacturers push the envelope for their attention across channels. These are equally exciting times for retailers and manufacturers as the advances in consumer technologies and their expectations are driving substantially different conversations at the brand and retailer level than in years past.
Is it the medium or lifestyle that’s changing our media consumption?
I don't read newspapers.
I don't watch the local news.
I don't watch the national news.
This doesn't mean that the news doesn't matter to me but rather the way in which I consume the information does. I get my news in bite-sized chunks online as free minutes are available a couple times throughout the day.
The Daily
Despite my fragmented habits of consuming "news," I do however spend the time once per month to read magazines of interest to me. So how does "The Daily" fit into my routine?
"The Daily" iPad subscription for the news is an interesting concept. I have been testing it out and find myself liking the format but coming to the realization that it's just not how I keep up with news anymore.
I feel like this is more of a product of me not having 30 minutes to dedicate each day to rather than it being because of the convenience of the free news available online. I don't spend 30 minutes reading freely-available online news, either. It's not that I'm unwilling to pay for content, I'm just unwilling to pay for content I won't use.
The technology isn't what's changing my habits, it's the pace of life and lifestyle that is.
I actually don't hate the newspaper format. I enjoy the content available in newspapers -- my lifestyle however doesn't afford me the time to sit and read it each and every day.
If my favoriate magazine came via an iPad subscription, I would prefer to read it that way vs. on paper. But that's more a product of leveraging the convenience of the device rather than despising the paper its printed on.
Is the newspaper industry dying because of technology or because of consumer lifestyles?
A little bit of both. But I think it's more a product of consumer lifestyle than anything. Many people aren't paying for a newspaper anymore not because the content quality is poor but rather because they can't dedicate the time out of their day to sit and read. The Sunday newspaper probably remains the most-kept subscription because of the coupons and also because that's a day of the week where many do have a few moments to sit and unwind (all speculation - I have no data to support this).
The industry must adapt to the changing behaviors of consumers, not simply move the same concept to another medium.
The newspaper industry needs to instead learn how to deliver news that caters to the faster-paced lifestyles of consumers. It's certainly not in the printed format and it may very well not be via an iPad subscription. The iPad subscription of The Daily is no different than a newspaper -- I still need to dedicate time I don't have to reading it.
I hope The Daily succeeds because it will provide a blueprint for other traditional publishers to make the switch to Digital Media and we will see some creative work come out of it. However, the concept is fundamentally flawed because it has taken the same business model and made it available on a different medium -- and its demise may very well be because consumers' reading habits for the news simply aren't what they used to be.
The Case for Marketing Technologists
Scott Brinker over at the Chief Marketing Technologist blog recently interviewed me about my experience going into Marketing, then IT, and back to Marketing again as a part of a series in which he is covering "Marketing Technologists" across various organizations. (Thanks, Scott!)
On a related note, in an article on February 7th from VentureBeat about Microsoft potentially cleaning house to make room for more technologists on the Executive team, this particular quote from an Analyst in the article resonated with me:
“You see the engineering team ascending because Steve is realizing that there is a need to execute on a vision and in order to do that you have to actually understand how software is built,” said Wes Miller, an analyst at the Kirkland, Washington-based research firm Directions on Microsoft, in an interview with Bloomberg Businessweek. “It’s a whole other thing to be able to say, ‘I’ve been at Microsoft, I understand software, and what you are saying will or will not work.’”
The underlined portion is of particular interest to the Marketing Technologist - in order for Marketing departments to execute on a vision, an understanding of the technological underpinnings for that vision and the end-user experience it delivers is vital.
The Era of the Marketing Technologist
More importantly, you don't have to be a software company like Microsoft to require this expertise. For more in-depth discussion on the topic, read Scott's post on The Rise of the Marketing Technologist.
Making the Case for an Embedded Marketing Technology Team (E-Business)
In my interview, I make the case that Marketing departments should even have their own technology arm - at our organization we call it the E-Business team. E-Business drives multichannel sales, new customer acquisition, brand recognition and loyalty, and customer retention. For more on E-Business, read on.


